At the start of the new year, as we also await the start of the legislative session, a couple of interesting things to be aware of.

As noted in recent postings, there’s been a lot of state-level action on housing and land use issues.  We’ve had the  legislative priorities from the Unified Economic Opportunity Commission, the Performance Audit of Utah Housing Policy by the legislative audit subcommittee, and the announcement by the Governor of his housing priorities and budget recommendations, including  the appointment of a Senior Advisor for Housing Strategy and Innovation.

The housing audit makes the recommendation that state officials should be more proactive in development statewide housing policies.  The Senior Housing advisor, former state representative and former Ogden Valley planning commissioner Steve Waldrip, however, was recently quoted in a Moab Times-Independent story saying that the way to perhaps accomplish this is to have the Associations of Government (AOGs) take a more up-front role.

Waldrip, the former state representative, wants Utah to explore empowering regional government bodies to develop housing policy. He said those entities could liaise between municipalities and the state, employing a more holistic view on housing challenges while still giving local governments a voice.

“Otherwise,” Waldrip said, “what happens is you get a law rammed down the throats of the local governments, and they immediately start looking for loopholes.”

Kind of what I’ve been pointing out in previous postings about what’s happening on zoning reform around the country.

The idea of viewing things from the perspective of the AOGs makes some sense, as each area of the state has some peculiar issues and characteristics, most obviously the more rural areas have a whole different set of problems than do the more urban counties.

This is apparent and emphasized in the recently released report from Envision Utah on BEST PRACTICES FOR HOUSING ATTAINABILITY.  The report gives,

7 recommendations for the state and regional associations of governments along with 6 recommendations for local governments

  1. Education the public about the need for more housing

  2. Develop materials for training local government officials about what they can do to promote housing affordability and how to address concerns.

  3. Assist communities with transportation infrastructure to soften community opposition to more housing.

  4. Analyze and address non-zoning barriers to condominium development to promote ownership opportunities.

  5. Consider state-level financial assistance for structured parking in centers and transit-oriented developments.

  6. Standardize plan review and inspection for offsite construction.

  7. Conduct a more in-depth analysis of available land and water to understand where growth can and should go and whether planning is adequate.

We are only two weeks away from the start of the legislative session, and there are still plenty of ideas about how to deal with housing affordability floating around.  Some of these ideas are being drafted into bills, others not yet.  It’s going require careful attention to what pops out and what the bills say as the session moves along.  Stay tuned.